Arsenal · decision win

Pinal County declined — on Fourth Amendment grounds

Dark graphic with a green "Declined to renew" label above "Pinal County, Arizona", the date August 5 2026, and a note that the sheriff will not renew a roughly 45-camera Flock Safety contract, citing constitutional concerns.

Downloads

Alt text

Copy this with the image. An unlabelled graphic is unreadable to anyone using a screen reader, and posting one without alt text from a civil-liberties account is a bad look for a good reason.

Dark graphic with a green "Declined to renew" label above "Pinal County, Arizona", the date August 5 2026, and a note that the sheriff will not renew a roughly 45-camera Flock Safety contract, citing constitutional concerns.

Captions

Written to preserve the distinctions the underlying record makes.

X

A county sheriff just declined to renew his Flock contract — and the reason he gave was the Fourth Amendment, not the budget. ~45 cameras, about half of them in San Tan Valley, a town that incorporated five weeks earlier.

Facebook

Pinal County's sheriff announced he will not renew the county's Flock Safety contract when it expires, citing Fourth Amendment concerns. A sheriff declining a surveillance tool on constitutional grounds — rather than on cost or performance — is unusual, and it is an argument that travels to neighbouring jurisdictions in a way a budget complaint never does.

The record behind it

Sources behind this graphic

  • Coverage of the Pinal County Sheriff's Flock contract non-renewalABC15 ArizonaReports Sheriff Ross Teeple's announcement that the office will not renew its Flock Safety contract, citing Fourth Amendment concerns. The service agreement itself, the exact expiration date, and the per-unit camera count remain unobtained — see the open questions on the Pinal County record.Local reporting

Verified as of

Licensed CC BY 4.0. Reuse it, credit Unsurveilled, and keep the claims intact.